Recent doctoral dissertations at Åbo Akademi
During the last academic year three doctoral dissertations in philosophy were defended at my old department at Åbo Akademi, Åbo/Turku, Finland:
Ylva Gustafsson, Interpersonal understanding
and theory of mind (19 September, 2014)
Summary: The claim that a “theory of mind”,
is a fundamental cognitive capacity that grounds human social life is popular
within both modern philosophical and psychological theorising on interpersonal
understanding. This claim surfaces in evolutionary psychology, in theories of
child development, in theories of autism as well as in philosophy on emotions
and in moral philosophy. The aim of this work is to scrutinise certain
psychological and philosophical theories on interpersonal understanding that
are connected with empirical research. The author argues that the theories as
well as the empirical research are often based on problematic philosophical
assumptions about interpersonal understanding. The assumptions shape the
theories and also shape the way empirical research is designed and the way results are
interpreted.
For the full text, see https://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/98819
¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
Antony Fredriksson, Vision, Image,
Record – A Cultivation of the Visual Field (9 January, 2015)
Summary: The first part of
this thesis delivers a genealogy of the image.
It chronicles how the concepts of image, vision and the self evolved in
relation to one another in a specific scientific and philosophical context,
starting with the early Renaissance, which saw the invention of the
perspectivist painting, up to the birth of Positivism and the photographic
image. This development entailed a form of reductionism in which “the self” –
the role of human psychology, our judgement, our attention and our will – was
sidestepped. Within this intellectual tradition there is only a short step,
from the understanding of the image as a representation of three-dimensional
space on a two-dimensional surface, to the idea of the image as a transparent
picture, a window towards the world. By taking this short step one would easily
lose sight of the role of the self in the practices
of making and viewing images.
In the second part the author
offers an alternative to the intellectual tradition described in the first
part. The idea of depiction as a neutral “view from nowhere” would support a
skeptical attitude towards communication, dialogue and human testimony, and
therefore our reliance upon each other and consequently our reliance on ourselves.
What was forgotten in this understanding of the image as a view from nowhere,
was that the image is an aid in the task cultivating our visual field, an aid
in sharing our views. Due to this
function of sharing, the image becomes a guide as we find our orientation in
this world. I might stand beside another person and see what she sees, but I do
not necessarily know her reading of it. The image adds a dimension to this
relation, since it does not only show me what the other sees. When an image
works properly it also shows how that
other person sees, and thus the image becomes an agent.
While the present thesis combines
the fields of philosophical epistemology, history of science and visual
studies, its main interest is philosophical. It engages with philosophical
misconceptions of depiction as a mimetic art form, of knowledge as
domestication and of perception as reception of data.
For the full text, see http://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/103039
¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
Mari Lindman, Work
and Non-Work : On Work and Meaning (8 May, 2015)
Summary: It may seem self-evident that
employment is crucial to a happy life and that job creation is a central
societal concern. However, this dissertation suggests that work is neutralized
when it is understood simply as a valuable societal asset or as an individual
life project, while its existential, ethical and political significance in a
specific life situation is ignored. One example of such neutralization is when
the importance of work is reduced to the importance of “having a job”, whatever
its practical content or purposes. To challenge such neutralizations, the
author looks at the tension within the conceptions of work (necessity, hard
work and self-realization are three examples) which underlie them. The danger
of such neutralization is that political and existential worries about work and
the working life are swept under the rug. The book aims to repoliticize work by
looking at it as an essentially contested concept. The author suggests that
important aspects of work are revealed within such contestations of the role of
work in our lives and that tensions can be a fruitful point of departure for
resisting neutralizations of work. All chapters are structured around dialogues
with critical accounts of work, including those of Hannah Arendt, André Gorz,
Kathi Weeks, Simone Weil, Raimond Gaita, Karl Marx and Richard Sennett. What
does it mean to say that society has been invaded by necessity? What does it
mean to imagine a society beyond wage labor? Is it a utopia or a dystopia to
think about work as a limitless activity? What is at stake when work becomes a
commodity on the market? What are the hazards of fragmentation of work?
For the full text, see http://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/104317
